Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42386918›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2026

An effort recalibration framework for digital media use and cognition.

Wisnu Wiradhany, Douglas Parry, Jaan Aru

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wisnu WiradhanyFaculty of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. wisnu.wiradhany@atmajaya.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-3146
Douglas ParryDepartment of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-3425
Jaan AruInstitute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquity of digital media has sparked widespread debate over their potential effects on our cognition, often centred on concerns about declining cognitive capacity. We propose a framework in which digital media use may influence cognition mainly by recalibrating how effort is valued and allocated. Platforms engineered for minimal friction and immediate reward can reinforce habit loops that bias cost-benefit computations, making low-effort digital activities feel more valuable than cognitively demanding tasks such as focused work. Over time, this recalibration of effort valuation may shift effort allocation tendencies towards exploration rather than the sustained exploitation required for mastery and durable knowledge acquisition. We outline an interdisciplinary research agenda that integrates experimental, neurobiological and longitudinal approaches to empirically test this effort recalibration framework and shift the focus from whether digital media harm cognition to whether and how they reshape our willingness to invest effort in everyday life.

Indexed as

CognitionDigital MediaHumansReward

Identifiers

PMID42386918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.