Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42386915›Full record

Trial reportNature human behaviour2026

Building capacity for unity in diversity.

May Farid, Prashant Loyalka, Christina Felfe, Dinsha Mistree

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

May Farid *Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Prashant Loyalka *Graduate School of Education and Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. loyalka@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-6074
Christina FelfeDepartment of Economics and Cluster of Excellence The Politics of Inequality, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany. christina.felfe@uni-konstanz.de.
Dinsha MistreeHoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social cohesion-the strength and quality of social interactions among individuals, communities and institutions-is critical to the well-being and prosperity of entire societies but is increasingly weakened by fragmentation and polarization. Existing attempts to strengthen social cohesion largely target specific social divides, such as those based on ethnicity, religion or nationality. We take a different approach, developing an intensive educational programme grounded in identification with all humanity-enabling participants to widen their circle of inclusion beyond any single social categorization and fostering their capacity to contribute to unity in diversity. Evaluating the programme through a large-scale randomized controlled trial with 8,648 youth in India, we show that programme participation reduces discriminatory attitudes and behaviours independent of any given social divide, enhances prosocial behaviours across group boundaries and bolsters civic attitudes and engagement. These findings suggest that interventions targeting universal human identity offer a promising path to social cohesion.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversitySocial BehaviorSocial IdentificationAdolescentAttitudeFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansIndiaInterpersonal RelationsMaleSocial Group

Identifiers

PMID42386915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.