Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42386894›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning classification of nasal anatomical variants on computed tomography for endoscopic sinus surgery.

Luís Rita, Abdul Rafay, Hamideh Kerdegari, Matth Kot, Ivan Laponogov, Kyle Higgins, Dennis Veselkov, Issa Beegun, Hesham Saleh, Kirill Veselkov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luís Rita *Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Abdul Rafay *Department of Rhinology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Hamideh KerdegariDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Matth KotDepartment of Rhinology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Ivan LaponogovDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Kyle HigginsDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Dennis VeselkovDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Issa BeegunDepartment of Rhinology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Hesham SalehDepartment of Rhinology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. h.saleh@imperial.ac.uk.
Kirill VeselkovDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK. kirill.veselkov04@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 10058099HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme 101095359UK Research and Innovation 10058099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) carries risks such as vision loss and intracranial injury due to the proximity of critical structures and unrecognised anatomical variants. We developed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect free-floating anterior ethmoidal arteries (FFAEA), Onodi cells, and Haller cells on coronal sinus CT, and evaluated BioMedCLIP, a biomedical vision-language model (VLM), in a few-shot setting. CT scans from 122 ESS patients were anonymised, standardised coronal CT images were captured, and variant presence was annotated. Five ImageNet-pretrained CNN backbones were assessed using repeated patient-wise five-fold cross-validation across 40 configurations. The best CNNs achieved balanced accuracies of 77.8 ± 2.3% (FFAEA), 74.6 ± 2.5% (Onodi), and 63.7 ± 6.2% (Haller). BioMedCLIP achieved 65.5 ± 3.2%, 63.8 ± 1.8%, and 73.5 ± 3.6%, respectively, outperforming CNNs for Haller cell detection while providing competitive performance for the other variants. These models demonstrate proof-of-concept performance for automated identification of selected sinonasal variants on standardised coronal CT images under internal patient-wise cross-validation.

Indexed as

Anatomic variationComputed tomographyConvolutional neural networksDeep learningParanasal sinusesVision-language models

Identifiers

PMID42386894
PMCPMC13623651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.