ArticleScientific reports2026
A global assessment of reptiles in the skin trade.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We collated and analyzed information from multiple sources to assess conservation implications of the commercial trade in reptile skins from 2000 to 2020. Of > 71 million skins reported over that period, the most heavily-traded taxa were three crocodilians (Caiman crocodilus, Alligator mississippiensis, Crocodylus niloticus), three snakes (Homalopsis buccata, Cerberus rhynchops, Malayopython reticulatus) and one lizard (Varanus salvator). In total, 70% of exports were from Indonesia, Colombia, United States, Malaysia, and Argentina, and 78% of imports were from Singapore, Italy, Mexico, France, and Germany. Approximately 45% of traded animals were reported to be collected from the wild, with most others being captive-bred (37%). Traded species exhibited highly specific traits including large body size, broad distributions, and high reproductive output. The squamates in trade generally have relatively early age at maturity and large clutch sizes. Together, these life history and ecological traits make traded species amenable to sustainable use. Most reptiles in the skin trade are ranked as Least Concern by the IUCN, and reptile species traded for skins are less threatened overall than non-traded species. Despite the large volume of commercial trade in reptile skins globally, this harvesting appears to be biologically sustainable in the vast majority of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.