ArticleNature communications2026
A deep learning framework for efficient pathology image analysis.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Swarm intelligence-guided ROI selection for deep learning assessment of HER2 in colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into colorectal cancer reporting.The Journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence for colposcopic and cytological image analysis in early cervical cancer detection.iScience · 2026Review
- A Systematic Literature Review on Integrated Deep Learning and Multiagent Vision-Language Frameworks for Pathology Image Analysis and Report Generation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- A deep learning framework to iDentify prOgnostically releVant cancEr Regions (DOVER) within whole slide histopathology images.Cancer letters · 2026Article
- A multimodal whole-slide foundation model for pathology.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Pathologist-interpretable breast cancer subtyping and stratification from AI-inferred nuclear features.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Fully Automated Stain Quantification Framework for IHC Whole Slide Images in Breast Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has transformed digital pathology by enabling biomarker prediction from high-resolution whole-slide images. However, current methods are computationally inefficient, processing thousands of redundant tiles per slide and requiring complex aggregation models. We introduce EAGLE (Efficient Approach for Guided Local Examination), a deep learning framework that emulates pathologists by selectively analyzing informative regions. EAGLE combines task-agnostic tile selection with detailed feature extraction and is benchmarked against leading slide- and tile-level foundation models across 43 tasks from nine cancer types spanning morphology, biomarker prediction, treatment response and prognosis. EAGLE outperforms patch aggregation methods by up to 23% and achieves the highest overall classification performance. It processes one slide in 2.27 s, reducing computational time by more than 99% compared with existing models. This efficiency supports rapid and auditable workflows by enabling review of the exact tiles used for each prediction and reducing dependence on high-performance computing. By reliably identifying informative regions and minimizing artifacts, EAGLE provides robust and auditable outputs, supported by systematic negative controls and attention concentration analyses. Its unified embedding enables rapid slide search, integration into multi-omics pipelines and emerging clinical foundation models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.