Trial reportBlood cancer journal2026
Zanubrutinib combined with R-CHOP in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with specific gene alteration: a phase II study.
Trial report in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05290337 (Phase 2 Study of Zanubrutinib Plus RCHOP), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 2 Study of Zanubrutinib Plus RCHOP (ZR-CHOP) in Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma With Specific Gene Abnormality
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond MYD88-only testing: MYD88/CD79B profiling improves molecular detection and MCD genotyping in VRL and CNS lymphomas.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains clinically heterogeneous, and outcomes with R-CHOP are suboptimal in patients carrying high-risk genomic alterations such as MYD88, CD79B, NOTCH1, TP53 mutations or MYC rearrangements. Many of these lesions are associated with aberrant BCR signaling, and prior studies in relapsed disease have suggested a degree of sensitivity to BTK inhibitors. These observations provided the rationale for evaluating zanubrutinib in the frontline setting for genomically defined high-risk disease. We conducted a prospective, single-center phase II study in previously untreated DLBCL patients aged 18-75 years with one or more of the above molecular features. To accommodate molecular testing time, patients received one initial cycle of R-CHOP, followed by five cycles of zanubrutinib plus R-CHOP (ZR-CHOP). Response was assessed using Lugano 2014 criteria. Primary endpoint is 3-year PFS; key secondary endpoints include ORR, OS, EFS, and safety. From February 2022 to April 2024, 59 patients were enrolled; 58 were evaluable for efficacy. Molecular subtyping identified 25 MCD-like, 16 A53-like, 3 N1-like, 10 other subtypes, and 4 MYC-rearranged cases. The ORR was 91.4% (53/58), with a CMR rate of 79.3% (46/58). MCD-like patients showed particularly favorable responses, with 84% achieving CMR. After a median follow-up of 30.1 months, the estimated 3-year PFS and OS were 80.3% (95%CI 70.5-91.5%) and 89.1% (95%CI 81.2-97.8%), respectively. MCD-like subgroup showed a 3-year OS of 100%, whereas N1-like had markedly poorer survival (2-year OS 33.3%). AEs occurred in 56/59 patients, mostly grade 1-2. Grade ≥ 3 events occurred in 57.6%, most commonly myelosuppression. No atrial fibrillation or other cardiac toxicities were observed. ZR-CHOP demonstrates encouraging activity and acceptable safety in molecularly selected high-risk DLBCL, particularly in the MCD-like subgroup. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05290337).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.