ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Accuracy of Palpation-Guided Versus First Attempt at Ultrasound-Guided Electromyography Needle Placement for the Extensor Carpi Radialis Longus and Brevis by Trainees.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsUltrasound (US) guidance may be essential for accurate electromyography (EMG) needle placement in less-commonly evaluated muscles, such as the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) and brevis (ECRB), and particularly for identifying suitable donor muscles prior to tendon transfers to restore upper extremity function. Our primary aim was to compare the accuracy of trainee palpation-guided versus first-attempt US-guided needle placement. Our secondary aim was to describe the locations of inaccurate needle placement.
methodsSeven subjects each performed four needle placements (ECRL and ECRB, both palpation-guided and US-guided), totaling 28 placements into a cadaveric specimen. US-guided needle placement was performed with one attempt after one live demonstration.
resultsNo palpation-guided ECRL attempts were accurate while only two of the palpation-guided ECRB attempts were accurate. First-attempt US-guided needle placement was significantly more accurate overall (64.3% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.020), and specifically for ECRL (71.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.025). Combining palpation-guided ECRL and ECRB attempts, the needle was inadvertently placed in the extensor digitorum communis (50%), extensor carpi ulnaris (16.7%), and brachioradialis (16.7%). Both US-guided ECRL-intended errors involved placing the needle into the adjacent ECRB. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that EMG needle placement into ECRL and ECRB by trainees may be more accurate with US guidance. Accurate preoperative individual needle assessments of both wrist extensors are essential for patients with tetraplegia considering reconstructive surgery to restore functional grasp and should be performed with US guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.