ArticleEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Utilising human cellular models of primary ciliary dyskinesia: a scoping review.
Article in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) comprises a group of rare genetic disorders that primarily affect the function of motile respiratory cilia, leading to progressive sinopulmonary disease. Disease models can be used to investigate potential therapies or responses to environmental exposures. We sought to identify and describe knowledge gaps in the modelling approaches and outcome measures used in applied
methodsWe conducted a scoping review of Medline and Embase (2000-2024), screening studies of
resultsOf the 612 screened abstracts, 10 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. The modelling approaches included primary cell culture at an air-liquid interface (ALI) (n=5), spheroid culture (n=2), organoid culture (n=2) and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived ALI culture (n=1). Modelling protocols were heterogenous. Applications included 1) therapeutic gene correction or replacement applications (n=4) and therapeutic drug screening (n=1), or 2) exposure to infection (n=4), drugs (n=3) and house dust mite allergen (n=1). Outcome measures used for both model characterisation and evaluation of therapeutic interventions were inconsistent. Certain outcome measures, such as ciliary function, were reported inconsistently, which limited interpretability of findings.
conclusionA variety of PCD models exist but a lack of standardised characterisation hinders the reproducibility and comparability of findings. Consensus is needed on the minimum requirements for model characterisation and standardised reporting of outcome measures, which will facilitate model development for therapeutic and exposure applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.