ArticleBMJ open2026
Drinking water salinity and blood pressure in coastal Bangladesh: follow-up of a population-based cohort in a climate-vulnerable region.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the association between drinking-water sodium concentration and blood pressure among non-pregnant women living in a high-salinity, climate-vulnerable coastal region of Bangladesh.
designFollow-up study of women originally enrolled in a population-based study conducted during pregnancy between 2009 and 2011.
settingRural coastal subdistrict in southwest Bangladesh affected by saltwater intrusion and seasonal drinking-water insecurity.
participantsOf 1208 women enrolled in the original study, 900 were located in 2018 and 740 non-pregnant women were re-enrolled and included in the present analysis. Eligible participants were women from the original study who were alive and still residing in the study area; women who had migrated could not be located, declined participation or were pregnant at follow-up were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was blood pressure, measured using a standardised protocol. Main exposure was sodium concentration in household drinking water and reported drinking-water source. Secondary analyses assessed temporal changes in drinking-water sodium between 2009 and 2018 and associations with water source, perceived taste and changes in exposure over time.
resultsMean sodium concentration in household drinking water was highest in groundwater/tubewell users (933 mg/L, SD 372). Approximately 22% of women consumed drinking water contributing up to 94% of the WHO-recommended maximum daily sodium intake, assuming 2 L/day consumption. Sodium concentrations increased in seven of nine administrative unions between 2009 and 2018 (p=0.013). Compared with women consuming water containing <200 mg/L sodium, exposure to >1000 mg/L was associated with higher odds of raised diastolic blood pressure (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.77; p=0.001). Restricted cubic spline and piecewise regression models suggested a non-linear association, with a threshold near 1000 mg/L. No statistically significant association was observed for systolic blood pressure.
conclusionsHigh sodium concentrations in drinking water were associated with elevated diastolic blood pressure among women in coastal Bangladesh. Drinking-water salinity may represent an under-recognised cardiovascular risk in climate-vulnerable coastal populations. These findings support the need for salinity surveillance, climate-resilient low-sodium drinking-water supplies and further research to inform health-based standards for sodium in drinking water. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.