ArticleBone & joint research2026
A rat muscle contusion model created by a modified drop-mass method using ultrasound.
Article in Bone & joint research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Muscle contusion healing remains challenging because incomplete regeneration can lead to excessive scar formation, which may impair functional recovery. Therefore, reproducible animal models are important tools for investigating the healing process and evaluating potential therapeutic strategies. This study aimed to establish a reproducible muscle contusion model using a modified drop-mass method with ultrasound. Furthermore, the feasibility of using this model for molecular screening of muscle contusion healing was investigated. Methods: A total of 70 male Wistar Hannover rats were initially enrolled in this study. Two rats were excluded because of tibial fractures after injury induction; therefore, 68 rats were included in the final assessments. In this model, the placement of the rat tibialis anterior muscle and the impactor tip was confirmed by ultrasound prior to dropping the weight. To evaluate the reproducibility of the injury, ultrasound measurements of muscle size, histological evaluation of muscle tissue structure, gene expression analysis of inflammation-related factors and macrophage markers, and muscle strength assessment were performed. Moreover, based on a comprehensive genetic analysis of samples collected from this model, molecules involved in the healing process of muscle contusions were screened. Results: Abnormal ultrasound images, including hypoechoic areas, were observed in all the injured muscles. A peak increase in the maximum muscle cross-sectional area was observed 24 hours after injury, which subsequently decreased. Histological analysis revealed fibrous tissue at seven days post-injury, becoming more prominent at day 14. Muscle strength was reduced at three and seven days after the injury. Inflammation-related genes were markedly upregulated on the day of injury, while the expression of macrophage marker genes increased three days post-injury. Ribonucleic acid sequencing revealed gene clusters, including tissue kallikrein ( Conclusion: A reproducible model of skeletal muscle contusion can be established using a modified drop-mass method guided by ultrasound. This model demonstrated potential utility for exploring the molecules involved in the healing process of muscle contusions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.