ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2026
Comparison of buprenorphine treatment by virtual-only vs. traditional clinicians.
Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFew patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) receive medications for OUD (MOUD), such as buprenorphine. Given that many patients, particularly those in rural communities, do not live near a clinician who prescribes MOUD, telemedicine could increase MOUD access. Some clinicians have adopted a virtual-only model of care delivery, which in theory could reach anyone. However, clinicians and policymakers are concerned about the quality of the virtual-only model.
methodsWe identified adults with commercial or Medicare Advantage coverage via UnitedHealthCare who started buprenorphine for OUD between September 2019 and December 2023. We compared the care provided by virtual-only vs. traditional clinicians.
resultsThere were 17,538 buprenorphine inductions during the study period, of which 568 (3.2%) were conducted by a virtual-only clinician. There were few substantive differences in who used virtual-only care. For example, patients initiating buprenorphine with virtual-only vs. traditional clinicians were equally likely to live in urban areas (82.6% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.53). Patients initiating buprenorphine with virtual-only clinicians had more visits in the 6 months after the initiation (8.5 vs. 5.7 visits, p < 0.01), were more likely to be on buprenorphine at 6 months (59.0% vs. 52.9%, p < 0.01), but had fewer days of continuous buprenorphine treatment (70.7 vs. 81.9, p < 0.01).
conclusionsOur results can inform ongoing debates about the strengths and weaknesses of virtual-only OUD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.