ArticleCell systems2026
High-throughput DNA engineering by mating bacteria.
Article in Cell systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated linear DNA assembly of A. thaliana's chloroplast and mitochondrial genome.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce SCRIVENER (sequential conjugation and recombination for in vivo elongation of nucleotides with low errors), an in vivo DNA assembly platform that streamlines and scales DNA engineering. SCRIVENER combines bacterial conjugation, in vivo DNA cutting, and homologous recombination to stitch DNA blocks together by mating E. coli in large arrays or pools. This approach is simpler, cheaper, and higher throughput than methods requiring DNA to be moved in and out of cells. We performed over 5,000 assemblies with 2 to 19 blocks (240 bp-12 kb) and assembled constructs up to 81 kb with high fidelity. Most errors are deletions between long repeats, but SCRIVENER minimizes their impact by enabling high-replication assembly and sequence verification at a nominal additional cost per replicate. The platform enables combinatorial library construction and DNA block reuse without PCR and is therefore a powerful tool to accelerate DNA design-build-test-learn cycles. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.