Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Efficacy of Low-Dose Naltrexone in Women With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A 12-Month Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Single-Centre Clinical Trial (INNOVA Study).
Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic and research frontiers in fibromyalgia: integrating pathophysiology with innovative drug repurposing.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow-dose naltrexone (LDN) has been used off-label for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) for over a decade, supported by small crossover trials. The INNOVA study evaluated the safety and efficacy of LDN 4.5 mg versus placebo on pain intensity over 12 months in women with FMS.
methodsIn total, 98 women with FMS were randomised to LDN 4.5 mg/day (n = 48) or placebo (n = 50). The primary outcome was change in pain intensity (NRS 0-10) from baseline to 3 months in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included functional impairment (FIQR), anxiety-depressive symptoms (DASS-21), cognitive impairment (MISCI), disability (WHODAS 2.0), pathological worry (GAD-7) and impression of change (PGIC/PSIC), assessed at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Perceived treatment allocation and safety were also assessed.
resultsAt 3 months, mean change in pain intensity was -0.33 points with LDN and -0.64 with placebo, with an adjusted between-group difference of 0.49 (p = 0.236, d = 0.19). Secondary outcomes showed minor and inconsistent changes, with low and similar responder rates (p = 0.219-0.954). Exploratory analyses suggested some improvement among participants who believed they had received LDN, although effects were inconsistent. Adverse events, predominantly mild and transient, were reported by 33 (68.8%) participants in LDN and 36 (72%) in placebo, and no treatment-related serious events occurred.
conclusionsLDN was well tolerated but did not demonstrate a clinically meaningful benefit over placebo for pain-related outcomes, underscoring the need for more effective pharmacological treatments. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This RCT provides the first long-term evidence on the efficacy and safety of LDN in FMS. LDN (4.5 mg), administered as an add-on treatment, has a favourable safety profile, but the findings indicate that it does not produce clinically meaningful improvements in FMS symptoms compared to placebo at short- or long-term follow-up. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence questioning its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.