ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2026
How Parents Cope With Value Tensions in Their Young Child's Nutrition: An Interview Study Informed by Paradox Theory.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When facing challenging nutrition decisions, parents experience tension between their personal values and those they have for their child. These tensions a risk of leading to unhealthy nutrition decisions, particularly in disadvantaged environments where resources for healthy nutrition are scarcer. Prioritising one value over another, i.e., a 'trade-off' such as a child's dietary health over the parent's convenience, can cause stress due to unsatisfactory outcomes and recurring value tension. Drawing on Paradox theory, this qualitative study examines how parents cope with nutrition-related value tensions. Paradox theory explains how individuals manage persistent tensions between competing values by adopting 'both/and' strategies that address both values simultaneously rather than choosing one over the other, i.e., 'either/or' strategies. In the present study, semi-structured interviews were held with 20 parents of children aged 0-5 living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Using abductive thematic analysis, we identified coping responses classified as 'either/or' (value trade-offs) and 'both/and' (compromise and paradoxical resolution). While trade-offs were more common, paradoxical resolution strategies, those that address competing values simultaneously, were less frequently employed during challenging moments related to nutrition decisions. Three main themes of 'both/and' coping responses emerged from the analysis: planning and preparing food, managing stressful child behaviours, and supporting children's healthy food acceptance. Factors facilitating these coping responses ranged from individual, interpersonal, to community levels, including time availability, social support, and healthy routines encouraged by daycare. Our findings suggest that 'both/and' coping, aligned with parents' values and context, can support parents in managing food provision and feeding challenges while upholding their values, provided there are sufficient facilitating factors available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.