ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2026
"It Depends on the Situation": Variability in How Surgical Oncologists Elicit and Integrate Patient Values.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding what matters most to patients is central to person-centered care, particularly in surgical oncology, where decisions often involve significant tradeoffs. We explored how surgeons elicit, integrate, document, and support patient values in cancer-related decision-making.
methodsThis qualitative descriptive study involved semi-structured interviews with surgical oncologists (June-September 2025). Participants were purposively sampled from a prior international survey to ensure variation in demographics. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Participant characteristics were summarized descriptively.
resultsFourteen surgeons participated. Most were male (71%), White (86%), and early-career (43%), practicing primarily in gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary surgery (each 43%) at academic centers (57%) in the U.S. South or Midwest (each 36%). Surgeons described various approaches to eliciting values, including inferring values from contextual clues and clarifying tradeoffs between survival and quality-of-life. Values elicitation was largely situational, occurring in high-risk or preference-sensitive contexts. When values conflicted with recommendations, surgeons adapted plans within oncologic safety. Documentation varied and was shaped by relevance, medicolegal concerns, and workflow. Barriers included time limitations, emotional distress, family dynamics, and limited training.
conclusionsValues elicitation was inconsistent and situational rather than routine. More structured, earlier approaches and system-level support may better align surgical decisions with patient values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.