ArticleJCO precision oncology2026
Perspectives From an Expert-Guided Discussion on Maximizing the Research Potential of Small Biopsy Tissue.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTissue biopsy specimens, both remnant diagnostic specimens and those collected for ancillary study, are an invaluable resource for clinical oncology research. However, using biopsy specimens for molecular research is associated with innate challenges, such as insufficient tissue and/or tumor content, and low nucleic acid yields as well as analyte degradation due to suboptimal preanalytical workflows.
methodsThe National Cancer Institute's Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch convened a meeting that included expert-guided discussions that centered on strategies to mitigate these challenges and their effects on molecular analysis.
resultsParticipants, who included medical oncologists, interventional radiologists, pathologists, and molecular biologists, offered best practice guidance on biopsy collection, preservation, storage, and extraction techniques. Their recommendations were largely based on the optimized workflows that were implemented at their respective institutions, which improved the likelihood of producing reproducible molecular data. Pre- and postcollection techniques, such as clear cross-team communication, prebiopsy scoring based on lesion- and patient-specific criteria, biopsy collection and handling practices, and tumor enrichment options, were also discussed.
conclusionThe proceedings revealed that increasing awareness of the challenges associated with research use of tissue biopsies is key to developing assay-specific strategies that ensure sufficient tumor specimens are available for molecular oncology research. The lessons shared here from large-scale and multicenter trials will, ideally, inform the design of new cancer research studies, thereby harnessing the full potential of valuable clinical biopsy specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.