Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42385106›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2026

Perspectives From an Expert-Guided Discussion on Maximizing the Research Potential of Small Biopsy Tissue.

Lokesh Agrawal, P Mickey Williams, Helen M Moore, Kelly B Engel, Sarah R Greytak, Alda L Tam, J Keith Killian, Daniel T Merrick, Ralph E Parchment, Stanley R Hamilton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lokesh AgrawalBiorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch (BBRB), Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0009-0002-9227-8116
P Mickey WilliamsMolecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD.
Helen M MooreCancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-4585-1581
Kelly B EngelGAP Solutions Inc, Herndon, VA.ORCID 0000-0003-4567-313X
Sarah R GreytakKelly Government Solutions, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-2823-7136
Alda L TamDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-6065-1556
J Keith KillianFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-9425-7023
Daniel T MerrickDepartment of Pathology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Ralph E ParchmentLaboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/Developmental Research Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD.ORCID 0009-0002-2634-7195
Stanley R HamiltonDepartment of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-8331-1052
Lyndsay N HarrisCancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-6719
James H DoroshowDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-4463-1790

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTissue biopsy specimens, both remnant diagnostic specimens and those collected for ancillary study, are an invaluable resource for clinical oncology research. However, using biopsy specimens for molecular research is associated with innate challenges, such as insufficient tissue and/or tumor content, and low nucleic acid yields as well as analyte degradation due to suboptimal preanalytical workflows.

methodsThe National Cancer Institute's Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch convened a meeting that included expert-guided discussions that centered on strategies to mitigate these challenges and their effects on molecular analysis.

resultsParticipants, who included medical oncologists, interventional radiologists, pathologists, and molecular biologists, offered best practice guidance on biopsy collection, preservation, storage, and extraction techniques. Their recommendations were largely based on the optimized workflows that were implemented at their respective institutions, which improved the likelihood of producing reproducible molecular data. Pre- and postcollection techniques, such as clear cross-team communication, prebiopsy scoring based on lesion- and patient-specific criteria, biopsy collection and handling practices, and tumor enrichment options, were also discussed.

conclusionThe proceedings revealed that increasing awareness of the challenges associated with research use of tissue biopsies is key to developing assay-specific strategies that ensure sufficient tumor specimens are available for molecular oncology research. The lessons shared here from large-scale and multicenter trials will, ideally, inform the design of new cancer research studies, thereby harnessing the full potential of valuable clinical biopsy specimens.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchNeoplasmsBiopsyHumansSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID42385106
PMCPMC13485331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.