ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2026
Pre-pregnancy evaluation of essential hypertensive women with poor obstetric history.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEssential hypertension is linked to increased maternal and perinatal risks. The aim of this study was to assess women with essential hypertension and poor obstetric history before conception to identify co-morbidities and placenta-related risk factors and to examine how preconception evaluation affects future pregnancy outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study involved women with poor obstetric history, with (n=25) or without (n=243) essential hypertension. Women were evaluated for co-morbidities and metabolic, immunological, inflammatory, and vascular/thrombotic risk factors. Subsequent pregnancies were then assessed for gestational outcomes.
resultsHigher levels of co-morbidity were found in the essential hypertension (+) group compared to high-risk controls (68 vs. 39.9%, p=0.013). Essential hypertension (+) women had significantly higher rates of chronic inflammatory diseases (28 vs. 5.8%, p=0.001) and carbohydrate metabolism disorders (44 vs. 10.3%, p<0.001) than in controls. Except for "APGAR<7" (p=0.016), we were unable to show any statistically significant differences between the study and control groups in terms of placenta-related obstetric complications and gestational outcomes in their forthcoming pregnancies due to necessary precautions and timely management of risk factors.
conclusionChronic inflammatory diseases and carbohydrate metabolism disorders, which are risk factors for both endothelial injury and placenta-related obstetric complications, are more frequently observed in pregnancies with essential hypertension. Preconception counseling is critical in reducing gestational complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.