Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42385014›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026

[Technological and market analysis of the hemodialysis membranes segment in Brazil based on federal public procurement data].

Gustavo Feliciano de Jesus Barcelos, Beatriz Godoi de Nogueira, Kátia Cecília de Souza Figueiredo, Carlos Alberto Tagliati

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gustavo Feliciano de Jesus BarcelosPrograma de Pós-graduação em Inovação Tecnológica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-2755
Beatriz Godoi de NogueiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Química, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4489-0830
Kátia Cecília de Souza FigueiredoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Química, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7207-1535
Carlos Alberto TagliatiPrograma de Pós-graduação em Inovação Tecnológica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1049-6754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyzes the market and technology of the hemodialysis membrane segment in Brazil, based on public acquisitions made by the Brazilian Company of Hospital Services (EBSERH, acronym in Portuguese). Kidney failure, which affects about 10% of the world's population, represents a growing challenge for health systems, and Brazil is highly dependent on imports to meet the demand for dialyzers. From August 2022 to July 2023, EBSERH acquired 144,162 dialyzers, from six international manufacturers, evincing the absence of a national production and a great technological dependence on Brazil. Additionally, the physical and transport characteristics of the membranes were evaluated, such as materials used (predominance of polysulfone), dimensions and ultrafiltration coefficient. The results point to the need for robust public policies to foster national production, reducing costs, promoting innovation and strengthening Brazil's technological autonomy. This work provides relevant information for the strategic planning of the hemodialysis sector, identifying gaps and opportunities for the development of a national hemodialysis membrane industry.

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialRenal DialysisBrazilHumansMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID42385014
PMCPMC13313152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.