ArticleBrazilian dental journal2026
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Accessory Canals in Primary Maxillary Molars Using Micro-CT.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to characterize the internal anatomy of primary maxillary molars by evaluating the presence and distribution of accessory canals using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Seventeen primary maxillary molars from donors aged 2 to 8 years were scanned using micro-CT and reconstructed using NRecon software. Only teeth with at least two-thirds of the root structure preserved were included. Image analysis was performed with ImageJ, supplemented by CTan and CTvol software. Accessory canals were identified and counted at each root and categorized by root third. Statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests, were applied (p<0.05). A total of 47 roots were analyzed, with 68.08% exhibiting at least one accessory canal, totaling 96 canals. The apical third showed a higher number of accessory canals compared to cervical (p=0.01), with a mean of 0.87±1.05, accounting for 42.71% of all accessory canals identified. The middle third had a mean of 0.80±1.42, representing 39.58% of the total, while the cervical third exhibited the lowest mean (0.36±0.84), corresponding to 17.71% of the overall canals. Notably, 57.44% of the apical thirds had at least one accessory canal. Also, considering the presence of at least one accessory canal, the apical third also presented a higher prevalence (p<0.01). Accessory canals are highly prevalent in the apical third, highlighting the complexity of their internal anatomy and the importance of thorough endodontic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.