ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2026
Stepwise plication of abdominal mesh technique for open abdomen closure.
Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo present the stepwise plication of abdominal mesh (SPAM) as a standardized dynamic closure technique that combines mesh-mediated fascial traction with negative pressure wound therapy for gradual abdominal wall approximation.
methodsIn this technical report, we present SPAM for progressive closure of peritoneostomy with excessive abdominal wall retraction. It involves a central mesh incision followed by progressive tightening via hemostatic clamp rotation (similar to opening a can with a key), without full-thickness mesh cut. The mesh is secured with continuous suture and covered with a non-commercial negative pressure system. Cycles are repeated every 48-72 hours until fascial closure.
resultsSPAM was applied in four patients: three successful cases (52-year-old male with rectal perforation, 36-year-old female post-Hartmann evisceration, 63-year-old female with gastrojejunal anastomosis leak) achieved primary fascial closure in a median of 10 days, with well-tolerated traction, no enteroatmospheric fistula, or incisional hernia. In one failure (59-year-old male with gastrojejunal leak post-laparoscopic gastrectomy), bleeding occurred during traction (controlled surgically), yet the technique was discontinued due to progressive clinical deterioration.
conclusionSPAM offers a practical, standardized, reproducible approach to delayed fascial closure, particularly in resource-limited settings, enabling controlled progressive approximation without mesh resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.