Observational studyJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2026
Synthesis of Protocols for Frostbite Care From the FROST Study Sites.
Observational study in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frostbite injuries can have lasting sequelae including amputations, intolerance to cold, chronic pain, paresthesia, and inability to return to work. Despite this morbidity, the treatment of frostbite remains understudied. The FRostbite ObServational Trial (FROST) aims to address this gap through a multicenter evaluation of treatment practices and outcomes. As part of FROST, we reviewed institutional frostbite care protocols from 16 participating sites across North America. Practices were categorized as demonstrating uniform agreement (≥90% mentioned the practice), consensus ($\ge$75%), or majority if ($\ge$50%). Uniform agreement was limited to use of rapid rewarming and thrombolytics, the latter being influenced by site selection criteria for FROST participation. Consensus was achieved in multiple areas (such as urgency of treatment, perfusion assessment, the therapeutic windows for pharmaceutical interventions, and the therapeutic dosing of IV thrombolytics). Protocols varied on grades for thrombolytic treatment initiation, prostacyclin analog use, postthrombolytic anticoagulation treatment and duration, the role of physical or occupational therapy, splinting, and appropriate wound care. This manuscript provides a synthesis of protocols and expert opinions for the acute management of frostbite injury. This synthesized protocol may serve as a tool for centers to develop their own standard protocol to facilitate care for frostbite patients. Additionally, current opportunities for frostbite research and improving care are detailed in the manuscript. Education regarding prevention of injury and the need for emergent treatment is needed for both the public and the medical community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.