ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2026
Direct Analysis in Real-Time Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Rapid Screening of Thirty-one Plant Growth Regulator Residues in Rehmannia glutinosa.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant growth regulators (PGRs) are widely used in plant-derived food cultivation. However, misuse may cause pollution and residual contamination. Challenges persist due to complex matrices and trace-level residual amounts, complicating detection in the plant foods. The present study developed a real-time direct analysis-high resolution mass spectrometry (DART-HRMS) method to determine 31 plant growth regulator residues in Rehmannia glutinosa. Quantification was performed using a matrix-matched calibration curve combined with internal standard correction. A strong linear correlation was observed between PGR concentration and the peak area ratio, with a correlation coefficient (R2) exceeding 0.99. LOQs were lower than the lowest residue limits in EU pesticide regulation (10 μg/kg) for the majority of analytes. Results confirmed that the method can detect these residues, with matrix-matched calibrations yielding acceptable recovery (70.1-119.8%) and precision (<20% RSD). The method was applied to the 16 cultivated R. glutinosa samples, and a total of four compounds were detected at concentrations ranging from 0.88 to 40.78 μg/kg. The results demonstrated that the method was simple, accurate, and reliable, making it suitable for detecting PGRs in R. glutinosa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.