Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42384714›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Physics-informed gaussian process regression for reproducible and uncertainty-aware CO2 injectivity prediction.

Shamsuddeen Adamu, Hitham Alhussian, Said Jadid Abdulkadir, Majdy Mohamed Eltayeb Eltahir, Sallam O F Khairy, Gasim Hayder, Mahdi Ali Lathbl, Hassan Salisu Mohammed, Abdulrazak Oladeji Adekunle, Gbolagade Kamaldeen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shamsuddeen AdamuComputer Information Science Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4015-1723
Hitham AlhussianComputer Information Science Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.
Said Jadid AbdulkadirComputer Information Science Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.
Majdy Mohamed Eltayeb EltahirKing Khalid University, Applied College of Muhayil Asir, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Sallam O F KhairyDepartment of Information Systems, College of Economics, Management and Information Systems, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman.
Gasim HayderEnvironmental Engineering Department, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman.
Mahdi Ali LathblComputer Information Science Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.
Hassan Salisu MohammedComputer Information Science Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.
Abdulrazak Oladeji AdekunleComputer Information Science Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.
Gbolagade KamaldeenComputer Information Science Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.
Samaila Musa AbdullahiDepartment of Cyber Security, Faculty of Computing, Air Force Institute of Technology, AFIT, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Yahaya SaiduComputer Information Science Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable prediction of CO2 injectivity decline is essential for safe geological carbon storage, yet existing machine learning models often provide deterministic point predictions that lack uncertainty quantification. This paper presents a physics-informed Gaussian process regression (PC-GPR) framework for Relative Injectivity Change (RIC) prediction, embedding constraints derived from two independently grounded physical laws: the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) colloidal monotonicity condition and the Civan-Kozeny-Carman permeability impairment model. Four GP variants are developed and benchmarked on a curated laboratory dataset (n = 44) under a three-tier validation protocol combining Leave-One-Out cross-validation, repeated k-fold cross-validation, and non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals. Two complementary uncertainty quantification mechanisms are employed: GP posterior calibration via the Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and split-conformal prediction intervals. The GP-Base model achieves strong predictive performance (LOO R2 = 0.9401, 95% CI: [0.882, 0.978]) with well-calibrated uncertainty (ECE = 0.026) and reliable coverage (97.7% at the nominal 95% level). The PC-GPR-M variant reduces DLVO monotonicity violations to 1.5% across the input domain, demonstrating effective soft constraint enforcement. Operationally, the proposed framework translates predictive uncertainty into actionable injection scheduling guidance, identifying high-risk regions at salinity >30,000 ppm and jamming ratio >0.04. These results provide an uncertainty-aware baseline for future PIML research in subsurface carbon storage.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideNormal DistributionPrediction AlgorithmsReproducibility of ResultsUncertaintyCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID42384714
PMCPMC13322525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.