ArticlePloS one2026
Development of a blended MOOC implementation model for English language learning: An interpretive structural modeling approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) into traditional English language education has created new opportunities for scalable, flexible, and inclusive learning. However, existing studies on MOOCs and blended learning remain largely descriptive and lack a structured framework that prioritizes key implementation elements for effective integration into formal education. This study develops a structured implementation model for blended MOOCs (bMOOCs) tailored to undergraduate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction. This gap is particularly evident in specific contexts such as Vietnam, where institutional conditions, technological readiness, and learner characteristics significantly influence implementation effectiveness. Using the Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM), the research identifies and validates 20 key sub-indicators grouped into three interconnected phases: planning, implementation, and evaluation. The model emphasizes the importance of analyzing learners' backgrounds and motivations, setting clear learning objectives, and selecting appropriate materials and technologies. During implementation, the focus shifts to effective instructional strategies, learner participation, and technical support. The evaluation phase prioritizes formative assessment and timely feedback to promote continuous improvement and engagement. This learner-centered approach addresses common challenges in blended learning environments. The model offers practical guidance for stakeholders in EFL education, such as administrators, educators, and curriculum developers, seeking to enhance English language education through blended MOOCs. Practical implications for the implementation of blended MOOCs in EFL instruction are also addressed to enhance the quality of English language instruction in the digital age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.