Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42384680›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Early warning signals for loss of control in complex systems.

Jasper J van Beers, Marten Scheffer, Prashant Solanki, Ingrid A van de Leemput, Egbert H van Nes, Coen C de Visser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Early warning signals for loss of control in complex systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasper J van BeersDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Control and Simulation, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629 HS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-2800
Marten SchefferDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2100-0312
Prashant SolankiDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Control and Simulation, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629 HS, The Netherlands.
Ingrid A van de LeemputDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0155-370X
Egbert H van NesDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6345-104X
Coen C de VisserDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Control and Simulation, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629 HS, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) 18378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining stability in feedback systems, from aircraft and autonomous robots to biological and physiological systems, relies on monitoring their behavior and continuously adjusting their inputs. Incremental damage can make such control fragile. This tends to go unnoticed until a small perturbation induces instability (i.e., loss of control). Traditional methods in the field of engineering rely on accurate system models to compute a safe set of operating instructions, which become invalid when the, possibly damaged, system diverges from its model. Here we demonstrate that the approach of such a feedback system toward instability can nonetheless be monitored through dynamical indicators of resilience. This holistic system safety monitor does not rely on a system model and is based on the generic phenomenon of critical slowing down, shown to occur in the climate, biology, and other complex nonlinear systems approaching criticality. Our findings for engineered devices opens up a wide range of applications involving real-time early warning systems as well as an empirical guidance of resilient system design exploration, or "tinkering." While we demonstrate the validity using drones, the generic nature of the underlying principles suggest that these indicators could apply across a wider class of controlled systems including reactors, aircraft, and self-driving cars.

Indexed as

autonomous systemsearly warning signalsquadrotorsroboticstipping points

Identifiers

PMID42384680
PMCPMC13342939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.