SynthesisPloS one2026
Monotherapy or combinations? Intravenous vitamin C in sepsis and septic shock: An umbrella review of 31 systematic reviews.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous (IV) vitamin C has been proposed as an adjuvant therapy in sepsis/septic shock due to its biological plausibility and safety profile, but the proliferation of reviews has not resolved its clinical utility. To synthesize the evidence on IV vitamin C (monotherapy, HAT-hydrocortisone+vitamin C+thiamine-and vitamin C+thiamine) in adults with sepsis/septic shock, prioritizing 28-30-day mortality. Umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, without language restriction). Quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2, overlap with CCA, and when available, TSA and component/network meta-analysis (CINeMA). Certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE with an anchor estimator per outcome and regimen. Thirty-one reviews were included (30 quantitative: 28 SR/MA and 2 component/network MA; 1 qualitative). Combinations (HAT and vitamin C+thiamine) did not reduce mortality; hemodynamic improvements (small decreases in ΔSOFA and vasopressor hours) were modest, did not translate into survival benefits, and were primarily attributable to the corticosteroid. Monotherapy showed a possible mortality benefit signal under specific conditions (initiation ≤24 h, intermediate dose 25-100 mg/kg/day, 3-4-day courses; more pronounced in sepsis than shock), but with low-to-moderate certainty due to heterogeneity, imprecision, publication bias, and very high overlap among reviews. Combination regimens (HAT and vitamin C plus thiamine) did not reduce mortality; hemodynamic improvements were modest, did not translate into survival benefits, and were primarily attributable to the corticosteroid component. For monotherapy, a possible mortality benefit signal was identified under specific conditions (initiation within 24 h, intermediate dose 25-100 mg/kg/day, 3-4-day courses, more pronounced in sepsis than shock), but overall certainty remains low-to-moderate due to heterogeneity, imprecision, publication bias, and very high overlap among reviews. These findings do not support routine use of IV vitamin C in any regimen; for monotherapy, the identified signal warrants rigorous multicenter trials in well-defined clinical scenarios before any recommendation can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.