ArticleThe Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons2026
Surgical Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization for Adults With Bicortical Scaphoid Fractures: A Target Trial Emulation of the SWIFFT Trial.
Article in The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial (SWIFFT) reported no notable difference in functional outcomes between surgical fixation and cast immobilization for minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures in UK settings. We aimed to emulate SWIFFT using Chinese hospital electronic health record (EHR) data to evaluate whether similar treatment effects are observed in a population with different risk profiles and to identify subgroups that may benefit differentially from surgery.
methodsThis target trial emulation used a clone-censor-weight design with inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighting. Deidentified EHR data were extracted from three Tertiary A teaching hospitals in China (July 2018 to August 2024). Adults aged 16 years or older with a bicortical scaphoid waist fracture (displacement ≤2 mm) presenting within 14 days of injury were eligible. Patients received either headless compression screw fixation (n = 2,544) or below-elbow cast immobilization (n = 4,225). The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at 52 weeks.
resultsAmong 6,769 patients (mean age 32.1 years; 81.6% male; 42.4% current smokers), surgery produced statistically significant DASH improvements at all time points. At 52 weeks, the adjusted mean difference was -4.2 (95% CI, -4.9 to -3.5; P < 0.001), below commonly cited MCID estimates (10 to 15 points) but approaching lower proposed thresholds (7 to 10 points). Surgery halved nonunion risk (8.4% vs 17.5%; RR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55) but increased complications sevenfold (14.1% vs 2.0%), predominantly screw-related. Subgroup analyses showed larger surgical benefits among patients with displaced fractures (-8.5) and current smokers (-6.7). Nearly one in five cast-treated patients (18.1%) ultimately required surgery for nonunion.
conclusionSurgery was associated with statistically significant but modest DASH improvements, halved nonunion risk, and a sevenfold increase in complications. Cast immobilization remains a reasonable initial strategy for undisplaced fractures, while surgery offers measurable advantages for displaced fractures or smokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.