ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026
The Safety of In-Hospital Delay and the Utility of dNLR in Elderly Patients With Acute Appendicitis.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElderly patients with acute appendicitis face high rates of complicated disease, yet the impact of in-hospital timing and the utility of simple biomarkers remain debated. We aimed to assess whether in-hospital timing influences severity and to evaluate the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as a risk-stratification tool.
methodsA retrospective study of 412 patients (184 aged ≥ 65 years; 228 younger controls) undergoing appendectomy (2010-2019) was conducted. We analyzed Patient Interval (symptom onset to admission) and Hospital Interval (admission to incision). Appendicitis was graded as uncomplicated or complicated (gangrenous/perforated). Multivariable regression and categorical sensitivity analyses (0-6, 6-12, 12-18, > 18 h) were used to identify predictors of severity.
resultsElderly patients had higher rates of complicated appendicitis (29.4% vs. 9.2%) and morbidity (13.0% vs. 1.3%). While night-shift admission increased time to diagnosis, it did not increase complications. Hospital Interval was shorter in the elderly (13.5 vs. 15.4 h) but was not an independent predictor of complications and showed no adverse trend across time categories. In the elderly, dNLR ≥ 4.0 independently predicted complicated disease (AUC 0.65) alongside age, fever, and Patient Interval. Mortality spiked to 8.3% in patients ≥ 85 years, driven by medical complications.
conclusionsDisease severity in geriatric appendicitis appears to be largely determined prior to admission. Within the limitations of this observational design, short in-hospital delays for optimization or logistical reasons were not associated with increased perforation or morbidity. Furthermore, a dNLR ≥ 4.0 helps identify high-risk patients, suggesting that an "optimize then operate" approach-prioritizing physiological stabilization may be a safe and reasonable strategy for clinically stable elderly patients.
trial registrationResearch Registry (UIN: researchregistry11765).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.