ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Ophthalmic artery Doppler: reference values in low-risk pregnant women.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOphthalmic artery (OA) Doppler has been described as an independent parameter in predicting preeclampsia (PE). Considering that vasoconstriction occurs in the pathogenesis of PE and causes increased pulse wave reflection, it is not surprising that OA waveform changes appear in PE. It was found that of these waveform changes, the 2nd systolic peak (P2) and the peak ratio [PR = P2/P1 (P1 = 1st systolic peak)] showed the best performance in prediction and complementary diagnosis of PE. The aim of this study was to determine reference values for OA-Doppler indices in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters and at term in low-risk pregnant women of a mixed European population. MATERIALS/
methodsThis is a prospective single-center cohort study conducted from 2020 to 2024. Only healthy pregnant women who gave informed consent were included. Women at high risk for PE or who developed PE were excluded. OA Doppler was performed according to a strict protocol at 4 distinct gestational-week (GW) intervals: 11-14 GW, 20-24 GW, 30-34 GW, and at term. The following systolic waveform parameters were focused on: P1, P2, and PR. Reference values were generated for these waveform parameters for these study intervals in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters and at term.
resultsA total of 255 women were included in this study. Of these, 62% were Caucasian, 7% Asian, 8% Afro-Caribbean, and 33% mixed or of unknown ethnicity. In this population, the PR averaged over the study intervals was 0.56, with no significant differences between the 4 study intervals or between the right and left eyes.
conclusionThis study presents systolic OA-Doppler reference values in low-risk pregnant women of an ethnically diverse European tertiary-care obstetric population. OA-Doppler reference values are stable throughout the four selected time points in pregnancy. These findings may pave the way for further investigations on OA-Doppler values as a predictive and diagnostic tool for PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.