ReviewSports medicine - open2026
Recovery Strategies in Elite-Level Male Rugby Union Players and Positional Considerations: A Scoping Review.
Review in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rugby union training and competition results in task-specific fatigue. As a result, practitioners working in elite rugby settings must identify and understand the position-specific demands placed upon players. Aligning appropriate recovery strategies is essential to optimise performance. Therefore, the primary aim of this scoping review is to explore current fatigue and recovery strategies in elite rugby players and investigate any specific strategies used to enhance recovery. The secondary aim of this scoping review is to discuss potential positional differences in relation to recovery strategies and fatigue markers. Thirty-seven articles were included in this scoping review, with results identifying a diversity in the recovery approaches taken, with cold water immersion the most commonly used, compression garments, partial and whole-body cryotherapy, electrostimulation, nutritional supplements (fish oil), pool-based active recovery, and innovative mattresses also utilised. The findings align with previous research showing that many recovery strategies have limited empirical support; however, an interesting finding from our review was that 26 studies included no specific recovery intervention (natural recovery) within their research methodology. Only five studies reported positional data results, meaning it is difficult to appropriately compare position-specific recovery or quantify the effectiveness of specific recovery strategies. Thus, this scoping review serves as a "call to arms" to the rugby union research community to identify position-specific data in future studies and then integrate positional specificity and individualised athlete needs to enhance recovery. Given the limited evidence that this scoping review has provided, there is a need to further explore the position-specific recovery strategies in future studies to assess their potential impact on performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.