Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42384265›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2026

Prenatal Diagnosis and Genomics in India - Historical Review, Current Status and Road Ahead.

Shagun Aggarwal, Shubha R Phadke

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shagun AggarwalDepartment of Medical Genetics, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India. shagun.genetics@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-9888
Shubha R PhadkeDepartment of Medical Genetics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo present an overview of the practice of prenatal diagnosis and genomics in India.

methodsThis manuscript was compiled through review of published literature, survey of peers and professional experience of authors.

resultsThe field of prenatal diagnosis in India had its beginnings in the 1980s with advent of ultrasound machines and invasive procedures. The high prevalence of birth defects and genetic diseases in the population had been recognized by pediatricians and clinical geneticists as early as the 1950-60s. Various factors, like epidemiological transition with increasing contribution of genetic diseases and birth defects towards adverse health statistics, enhanced awareness of health care providers and policy makers, availability of trained manpower and rapid advancements in the field of genomics have all led to expansion of the field of prenatal diagnosis and genomics in the country since these early times. Medical termination of pregnancy has been legally allowed since 1971 and culturally acceptable to the majority. In the last four decades, advances in prenatal diagnosis have given women the option to make decisions about termination of pregnancy by earlier detection of fetal structural and genetic abnormalities.

conclusionsThis study reviews the historical journey of the field in India and the current status. It also discusses the challenges faced by the country and the measures being undertaken to address the same.

Indexed as

GenomicsPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIndiaPregnancyCurrent statusHistoryIndiaPrenatal diagnosisPrenatal genomicsReview

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.