Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42384229›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2026

The complete mitogenome, phylogenetic placement and cox1 variation of Cape sea urchins (Parechinus angulosus) in southern Africa.

Suzanne Redelinghuys, Arsalan Emami-Khoyi, Gwynneth Matcher, Peter R Teske, Sándor Csányi, Miklós Heltai, Robert J Toonen, Francesca Porri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suzanne RedelinghuysSouth African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, 6139, South Africa. s.redelinghuys@saiab.nrf.ac.za.
Arsalan Emami-KhoyiInstitute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation, Department of Wildlife Biology and Management, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary. emami.khoyi.arsalan@uni-mate.hu.
Gwynneth MatcherSouth African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, 6139, South Africa.
Peter R TeskeCentre for Ecological Genomic and Wildlife Conservation, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sándor CsányiInstitute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation, Department of Wildlife Biology and Management, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Miklós HeltaiInstitute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation, Department of Wildlife Biology and Management, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Robert J ToonenHawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, 46- 007 Lilipuna Road, Kāne'ohe Hawai'i, 96744, Kāne'ohe, USA.
Francesca PorriSouth African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, 6139, South Africa. f.porri@saiab.nrf.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cape sea urchin, Parechinus angulosus, is a widely distributed keystone species that inhabits intertidal and subtidal ecosystems along the South African coastline. Despite its importance as an ecosystem engineer, its phylogenetic placement and mitochondrial genomic (hereafter mitogenome) variation remain poorly understood. In the current study, we present the first complete mitogenome for this species, assembled from long-read sequences generated on the Oxford Nanopore sequencing platform, and investigate its phylogenetic placement among other sea urchin species using a combination of Bayesian Inference and Maximum-Likelihood methods. METHODS AND

resultsA circular genome of 15 722 bp, with an average coverage of 159, comprising 13 protein-coding genes, two rRNAs and 22 tRNAs, was assembled de novo. Phylogenetic reconstructions based on 13 protein-coding genes recovered Paracentrotus lividus as the sister taxon of P. angulosus, and these two species formed a monophyletic clade with Loxechinus albus and Sterechinus neumayeri within Camaradont sea urchins. Using the mitogenome assembly as a template, an additional set of 29 cox1 sequences was mined from publicly available genomic sequences. These revealed that Cape sea urchins maintain substantial mitogenomic variation across their distribution range, expressed predominantly as low-frequency haplotypes.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that the Cape sea urchin is genetically distinct within the order Camarodonta and exhibits considerable variation in the cox1 gene across coastal habitats of southern Africa. Furthermore, the identification of a large number of low-frequency haplotypes may indicate population expansion or ongoing purifying selection.

Indexed as

Electron Transport Complex IVGenome, MitochondrialSea UrchinsAfrica, SouthernAnimalsBayes TheoremDNA, MitochondrialGenetic VariationPhylogenyRNA, RibosomalRNA, TransferSouth AfricaDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IVRNA, RibosomalRNA, TransferCape sea urchincox1 barcodesezRADMitogenome assemblyOxford Nanopore Technologyphylogeneticsphylogeography

Identifiers

PMID42384229
PMCPMC13323609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.