ArticleSurgery today2026
Clinical impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation status on recurrence patterns and the efficacy of local therapy after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesThe Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is defined as frequently mutated oncogenes in colorectal cancer. We aimed to clarify the clinical impact of KRAS mutation status on recurrence patterns, the surgical management of recurrent lesions, and prognostic outcomes after curative hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
methodsThe subjects of this retrospective study were 190 patients who underwent curative (macroscopic R0 resection) hepatectomy for CRLM and had wild-type (62.1%) or mutant (37.9%) KRAS status.
resultsKRAS mutations were associated with significantly worse overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as more aggressive recurrence patterns. Multivariate analysis identified KRAS mutation as an independent predictor of poor OS and RFS, whereas CEA ≥ 5 ng/mL was independently associated with OS but not RFS. Notably, patients from the mutant KRAS and wild-type KRAS groups who underwent local therapy (as repeat resection or ablation) for local recurrence had comparable OS. Conversely, among the patients who did not receive local therapy, those from the mutant KRAS group had significantly worse OS than those from the wild-type KRAS group.
conclusionsKRAS mutations are associated with aggressive recurrence patterns and a poor prognosis for patients with CRLM. However, survival following local therapy for recurrence appeared less pronounced regardless of KRAS status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42384210What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.