ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2026
Five-year stability of occlusal function in orthognathic patients with sagittal malocclusions : Digital quantitative follow-up study.
Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSuccessful orthognathic therapies are characterised by a physiologically configured occlusion whose long-term clinical stability is mainly assessed through occlusal parameters. In the present study, long-term treatment outcomes were assessed based on occlusal changes after 5 years using digital occlusion and masticatory efficiency analysis.
methodsThis study examined 33 adult patients after treatment of skeletal class II (n = 18; 12 women, median age 28.15 years; interquartile range [IQR] = 15.10) and class III malformations (n = 15; 7 women, median age 23.90 years; IQR = 4.80) 9 months (T1) and 5 years (T2) postorthognathic therapy. A total of 20 patients with neutral skeletal relation (10 women; median age 30.50 years; IQR = 7.50) served as a control group. Skeletal classification was based on sagittal jaw configuration (Wits) and habitual intercuspation was recorded using the T‑Scan Novus® (Tekscan Inc., South Boston, MA, USA) for digital occlusion analysis with the following variables: total tooth contact (TTC), occlusion time (TOC), occlusion asymmetry (OAS), anterior and posterior antagonism (ATC and PTC). In addition, masticatory performance was assessed using a standardized two-colour chewing gum bolus analysis.
resultsFive years after surgery (T2), none of the occlusal parameters differed significantly between the groups, indicating functional approximation to the control group. Longitudinal analysis revealed significant improvements within both surgical groups (T1 to T2). In class II patients, TTC, ATC and PTC increased, while TOC decreased significantly. Class III patients also showed significant increases in TTC, ATC and PTC with TOC and OAS remaining unchanged. Overall, both treatment groups demonstrated substantial recovery and long-term stabilization of occlusal function. Bolus homogeneity analysis showed no significant difference between control and treatment patients 5 years after surgery.
conclusionThe 5‑year observation of orthognathic treatment for sagittal jaw malformations showed significant improvements in occlusal parameters. Both masticatory efficiency and occlusal parameters measured at 5 years postoperatively did not differ significantly from the control group, indicating that the functional improvements achieved by the therapy were stable in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42384184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.