Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42384178›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Antibiotic stewardship in urology : Time to rethink?]

Fabian P Stangl, Giuseppe Magistro

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabian P StanglKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Giuseppe MagistroKlinik für Urologie, Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland. g.magistro@asklepios.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urological infections are among the most frequent bacterial diseases and result in a correspondingly high consumption of antibiotics with the associated known increased risk for the development of multidrug-resistant pathogens. For this reason, the measures summarized under the term antibiotic stewardship (ABS) are becoming increasingly more important for a rational use of antibiotics, which are explicitly underlined in the current European and German guidelines on urological infections. Despite these clear guideline recommendations the use of antibiotics in the urological practice is often suboptimal, especially in the treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria and the excessive use of fluoroquinolones. In this article the principles of ABS are illustrated based on the current guidelines, frequent false applications are described and practical recommendations are given for urologists when dealing with antibiotics in cases of urinary tract infections and urological interventions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipUrinary Tract InfectionsUrologyBacteriuriaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibacterial agentsAsymptomatic bacteriuriaMultidrug-resistant pathogensUrinary tract infectionsUrosepsis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.