ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Development and validation of a relapsing polychondritis disease-specific quality of life instrument (ERN ReCONNET RP-QoL).
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRelapsing polychondritis (RP) is a rare, multisystem inflammatory disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and a substantial impact on patients' daily functioning and well-being. Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in RP remains insufficiently characterized, and no disease-specific measurement tool is available so far. This study aimed to develop and validate the RP-QoL, a multilingual, patient-reported outcome instrument specifically designed to assess HR-QoL in individuals with RP.
methodsThe RP-QoL was developed within the European Reference Network ReCONNET using a structured four-step approach: (1) identification of relevant HR-QoL domains through systematic literature review, an international patient survey and expert consensus; (2) item generation; (3) pilot testing including cognitive debriefing; and (4) comprehensive psychometric validation. Validation analyses included assessment of internal consistency, structural validity, construct validity, convergent validity with the SF-36, and criterion-related validity.
resultsDomain identification incorporated input from 274 patients across 22 countries, leading to a 31-item pilot questionnaire with a 28-day recall period and 5-point response scale. Cognitive debriefing confirmed clarity, relevance, and feasibility. Validation in 239 patients from 19 countries (median age 55 years; 80% female) demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96). Exploratory factor analysis supported near-unidimensionality, with the first factor explaining 46.6% of variance. RP-QoL scores correlated strongly with disease impact (p = -0.62, P < 0.0001) and SF-36 physical (p = 0.65) and mental (p = 0.55, P < 0.0001) components (both P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). Discriminative ability was high (AUC = 0.87).
conclusionThe RP-QoL is the first validated, disease-specific HR-QoL instrument for RP, with robust psychometric performance and applicability in both clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.