SynthesisArchives of women's mental health2026
Prenatal exposure to nicotine and postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of women's mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostpartum Depression (PPD) is the most common mental health complication of childbirth, and has short-term and long-term consequences for mother, child, and the entire family. PPD is a function of several factors. Prenatal exposure to nicotine (PEN) by Active Tobacco Smoking (ATS), Secondhand Smoking (SHS), or Electronic Nicotine Products (ENPs) is a major potential risk factor. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarize and evaluate all evidence regarding the association between PEN and PPD.
methodsWe searched the following databases, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and CINHAL, for studies published between Jan.1st ,2000&Sep.19th ,2024, with the outcome PPD. Studies quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled Prevalence (PP) was calculated using the Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation method. Pooled Odds Ratio (pooled-OR) was estimated using a random-effects model. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out technique.
resultsOf 29 studies in the systematic review, 26 included in the meta-analysis. PP of PPD was 0.15,(95% CI[0.12-0.17]; I
conclusionThis meta-analysis reveals that the accumulated evidence shows a significant association between prenatal PEN and PPD; though this final finding should be interpreted cautiously due to the high heterogeneity. Therefore, the exposure-stratified estimates represent the principal findings of this meta-analysis. The findings indicates a significant association between prenatal ATS and PPD, but no clear conclusion could be drawn about prenatal SHS or ENPs use due to the limited number of studies. There is a need for future studies that prospectively assess the impact of SHS and ENP on PPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.