ArticleMedical mycology2026
The clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan result stewardship within a tertiary medical system.
Article in Medical mycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our Transplant Infectious Disease (TID) program implemented monitoring of all elevated bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) galactomannan (GM) results as a quality improvement (QI) project. Twenty-four hours after a positive result, a standardized email is sent to the primary providers if the GM result is unaccounted for based on clinical documentation. We performed a real-world, retrospective study to examine the impact of this intervention over one year (2022-2023) as well as the impact of an elevated BAL GM result on clinical decision-making. We captured the number of positive GM results that triggered notification of the primary team, and the number of times a single positive galactomannan triggered initiation or change of systemic antifungal therapy. We included 55 cases of BAL GM >1.0. In seventeen cases (31%), a single positive BAL GM result triggered the initiation of antifungal therapy. Most of these cases met criteria for probable IPA. The TID team contacted the primary team for 14 cases (25%) of elevated BAL galactomannan antigens, which led to a new start or change in antifungal regimen. Voriconazole was the most common definitive antifungal agent chosen. Though elevated BAL GM results were impactful in introducing or changing antifungal regimens, we identified a possible knowledge gap in the interpretation of elevated galactomannan results among clinical staff. Our study suggests that there may be value in the diagnostic stewardship and monitoring of BAL galactomannan results by infectious disease clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.