Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383914›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Zhixin Chen, Lianming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhixin ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-3121-901X
Lianming WangDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8975-1035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current status data are frequently encountered in many real life cross-sectional epidemiological, demographic, and medical studies, where each subject is examined only once, and the failure time of interest is never exactly observed but known to be either smaller or larger than the examination time for each subject by evaluating the failure status. Consequently, current status data are a mixture of left-censored and right-censored observations for the failure times of all subjects with or without covariates. In some real life studies, the test or diagnosis that is used to determine the failure status may be error-prone, and this leads to misclassified failure status for some or all subjects. The resulting data are referred to as misclassified current status data in the literature. In this paper, we study regression analysis of misclassified current status data and propose a novel estimation approach under the proportional odds model. Specifically, monotone splines are adopted to approximate the baseline odds function, and an efficient expectation-maximization algorithm is developed based on a data augmentation involving exponential and Poisson latent variables. An extension of the proposed method is also developed to account for the unknown test accuracy. The proposed method is shown to have excellent estimation performance in our simulation studies and is illustrated by an application to uterine fibroid data.

Indexed as

Regression AnalysisAlgorithmsFemaleHumansLeiomyomaModels, StatisticalCurrent status dataEM algorithmmisclassificationmonotone splineproportional odds model

Identifiers

PMID42383914
PMCPMC13478427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.