Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383907›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2026

Key Considerations in Evaluating Syphilis Therapeutics.

Lisa Frigati, Laurens Manning, Michael Marks, Oriol Mitjà, Thomas Fitzpatrick, Pingyu Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa FrigatiFrom the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital.
Laurens ManningThe Kids Research Institute Australia, Nedlands.
Michael MarksHospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospital.
Oriol MitjàSkin Neglected Tropical Diseases and Sexually Transmitted Infections Section, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Thomas FitzpatrickDivision of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Pingyu ZhouSTD Institute, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

NIHR NIHR304258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 70 years, penicillin has remained the cornerstone of treatment for syphilis. While penicillin remains highly effective, there is a pressing need to develop new therapeutic options driven both by ongoing challenges in the supply of benzathine-benzylpenicillin G (BPG) and the need for therapeutics that are more suitable for use in key populations such as pregnant women and infants. Our understanding of syphilis treatment was traditionally based on studies in the rabbit model, with an absence of robust human randomized control trial data. In the last decade, the emergence of the culture model has allowed a comprehensive assessment of a wide range of alternative antibiotics, and there are now a number of phase 2 and phase 3 trials of new therapeutics planned or in progress. Despite this, trials of novel agents for syphilis continue to face a number of major challenges. Progress remains limited by our reliance on indirect diagnostic methods, the need for agents to achieve adequate concentrations in the central nervous system, and for drugs to be suitable for use in pregnancy and infants. Overcoming these challenges requires multidisciplinary research incorporating basic science, pharmacokinetics, clinical trialists, and affected populations to drive forward the therapeutic agenda.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillin G BenzathineSyphilisTreponema pallidumAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRabbitsAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillin G Benzathine

Identifiers

PMID42383907
PMCPMC13326920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.