Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383905›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2026

Estimating the Value of Novel Tests for Active Syphilis in Zimbabwe: How Much Overtreatment Can Be Avoided?

Robyn M Stuart, Michael Marks, Chido Dziva Chikwari, Alina M Muellenmeister, Romesh G Abeysuriya, Griffins Manguro, Remco P H Peters, Darcy W Rao, Lori M Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robyn M StuartBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael MarksClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Chido Dziva ChikwariMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Alina M MuellenmeisterBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Romesh G AbeysuriyaBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Griffins ManguroBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Remco P H PetersDepartment for HIV, TB, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Darcy W RaoBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Lori M NewmanBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSyphilis diagnosis in resource-limited settings relies on syndromic management and treponemal-based antibody screening tests that cannot distinguish active infection from past-treated infection, both of which can lead to overtreatment. Point-of-care (POC) tests that detect active infection could reduce unnecessary treatment.

methodsWe developed an agent-based model of co-transmitting syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus, calibrated to Zimbabwe using population-based survey data (ZIMPHIA) and UNAIDS estimates. We modeled five scenarios involving two hypothetical new POC diagnostic products introduced from 2027: (1) a test detecting Treponema pallidum DNA in genital ulcer specimens, and (2) a non-treponemal test identifying active infection following a treponemal-positive result, applied across antenatal care, key population, and human immunodeficiency virus care settings. We also conducted a threshold-based cost analysis to assess whether reductions in unnecessary treatment alone could be cost-saving.

resultsUnder the current standard of care, approximately 112,000 adult syphilis treatments are administered annually across all modeled detection and screening use cases, of which approximately 80% are unnecessary (i.e., administered to individuals who do not have an active syphilis infection). Combining both diagnostics reduces overtreatment to 24% (a 3.4-fold reduction). Across use cases, each test avoids approximately 0.4 to 0.8 unnecessary treatments, implying cost savings whenever the test price is less than 40% to 80% of the treatment cost.

conclusionsEven under the conservative assumption that current syndromic management and screening practices achieve high syphilis treatment rates among care-seeking individuals, introducing POC diagnostics for active syphilis could substantially reduce overtreatment while maintaining treatment of individuals with active infection. Reductions in unnecessary treatment alone may be cost-saving at low test prices, even without accounting for downstream health outcomes. This analysis does not model the impact of improved diagnostics on transmission dynamics, congenital syphilis burden, or other health outcomes; studies that quantify these additional benefits are needed to inform a full economic evaluation.

Indexed as

OvertreatmentPoint-of-Care TestingSyphilisAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningRapid Diagnostic TestsSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidumZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID42383905
PMCPMC13326924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.