ReviewJournal of biochemistry2026
Time to rethink circadian rhythms beyond the transcriptome.
Review in Journal of biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The circadian clock generates ~24-hour rhythms in physiology by coordinating gene expression programs, but temporal mRNA profiles often fail to predict their protein function rhythms. This gap reflects regulatory layers beyond transcription, including rhythmic translation, protein stability, subcellular localization and post-translational modifications that collectively determine the circadian rhythms of protein abundance and activity. Here, we summarize evidence supporting a shift from RNA-level descriptions to protein-level frameworks and readouts of the circadian rhythms. Here, we highlight three topics: (i) protein abundance rhythms as informative but incomplete readouts, (ii) widespread circadian control of nuclear localization and phosphorylation that can occur without changes in total protein levels, and (iii) multi-tissue proteomic comparisons that reveal how circadian rhythms are organized differently across tissues. We then discuss how recent data-independent acquisition-based, high-throughput mass spectrometry accelerates cross-study reuse and hypothesis generation, as illustrated by a mouse circadian proteome atlas and an interactive portal enabled by Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer. Together, these advances motivate 'functional chronobiology', linking proteome dynamics to mechanism and disease-relevant physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.