Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383751›Full record

ReviewJournal of biochemistry2026

Time to rethink circadian rhythms beyond the transcriptome.

Yuta Otobe, Hikari Yoshitane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuta OtobeCircadiain Clock Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Kamikitazawa 2-1-6, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan.
Hikari YoshitaneCircadiain Clock Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Kamikitazawa 2-1-6, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan.

Funding

Grants-in-Aid for Transformative Research Areas 24H02299Grants-in-Aid for Transformative Research Areas 24H02302Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan 25K18426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian clock generates ~24-hour rhythms in physiology by coordinating gene expression programs, but temporal mRNA profiles often fail to predict their protein function rhythms. This gap reflects regulatory layers beyond transcription, including rhythmic translation, protein stability, subcellular localization and post-translational modifications that collectively determine the circadian rhythms of protein abundance and activity. Here, we summarize evidence supporting a shift from RNA-level descriptions to protein-level frameworks and readouts of the circadian rhythms. Here, we highlight three topics: (i) protein abundance rhythms as informative but incomplete readouts, (ii) widespread circadian control of nuclear localization and phosphorylation that can occur without changes in total protein levels, and (iii) multi-tissue proteomic comparisons that reveal how circadian rhythms are organized differently across tissues. We then discuss how recent data-independent acquisition-based, high-throughput mass spectrometry accelerates cross-study reuse and hypothesis generation, as illustrated by a mouse circadian proteome atlas and an interactive portal enabled by Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer. Together, these advances motivate 'functional chronobiology', linking proteome dynamics to mechanism and disease-relevant physiology.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmProteomeTranscriptomeAnimalsCircadian ClocksHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsProteomecircadian rhythmmass spectrometrypost-translational modificationprotein localizationproteomics

Identifiers

PMID42383751
PMCPMC13384777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.