Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383743›Full record

SynthesisClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Risk Prediction Models for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yana Xing, Weixin Cai, Lin Wang, Tong Wang, Fei Wu, Weige Sun, Yuan Yuan, Ran Zhang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yana XingIntensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0021-8920
Weixin CaiDepartment of Nursing, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0028-4077
Lin WangIntensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tong WangIntensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fei WuDepartment of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Weige SunDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuan YuanIntensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ran ZhangIntensive Care Unit, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesTo systematically review and critically evaluate the risk prediction models for DVT in patients with sICH and provide references for clinical practice.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang Database, and China Science and VIP were searched from inception to July 15, 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and applicability using the PROBAST checklist. The AUC values were pooled using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.ResultsA total of 9414 studies were initially identified, 19 risk prediction models were developed across the 15 included studies. The reported AUC across the 15 included studies ranged from 0.710 to 0.988. The pooled AUC for the 11 validated models was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.85). Age, D-dimer levels, hematoma volume, and GCS score on admission emerged as the most frequently significant predictors of DVT in sICH patients.ConclusionsExisting models show promising but not yet robust discriminative properties. Owing to the high risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity across studies, these models cannot be directly applied to routine clinical decision-making. Key variables including age, D-dimer level, hematoma volume and GCS score can support qualitative clinical risk stratification, and provide practical reference for formulating precise and individualized thromboprophylaxis strategies for sICH patients.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageVenous ThrombosisHumansPrediction AlgorithmsRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsdeep vein thrombosismeta-analysisrisk prediction modelspontaneous intracerebral hemorrhagesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42383743
PMCPMC13323654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.