SynthesisClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Risk Prediction Models for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesTo systematically review and critically evaluate the risk prediction models for DVT in patients with sICH and provide references for clinical practice.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang Database, and China Science and VIP were searched from inception to July 15, 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and applicability using the PROBAST checklist. The AUC values were pooled using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.ResultsA total of 9414 studies were initially identified, 19 risk prediction models were developed across the 15 included studies. The reported AUC across the 15 included studies ranged from 0.710 to 0.988. The pooled AUC for the 11 validated models was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.85). Age, D-dimer levels, hematoma volume, and GCS score on admission emerged as the most frequently significant predictors of DVT in sICH patients.ConclusionsExisting models show promising but not yet robust discriminative properties. Owing to the high risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity across studies, these models cannot be directly applied to routine clinical decision-making. Key variables including age, D-dimer level, hematoma volume and GCS score can support qualitative clinical risk stratification, and provide practical reference for formulating precise and individualized thromboprophylaxis strategies for sICH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.