Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383701›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2026

Current concepts in meniscal suturing techniques: indications, advantages, and limitations.

Marta Gabriela Kubisa, Michał Jan Kubisa, Agnieszka Grygiel, Robert Omilian, Przemysław Krakowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marta Gabriela KubisaDepartament of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Carolina Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0209-357X
Michał Jan KubisaDepartament of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka GrygielMasovian Center for Neuropsychiatry, Warsaw, Poland.
Robert OmilianDepartament of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Carolina Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Przemysław KrakowskiDepartament of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Carolina Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The meniscus is critical for load distribution and joint stability; tears disrupt biomechanics and accelerate cartilage degeneration, prompting a shift from meniscectomy toward preservation and repair. We review three core techniques - inside-out, outside-in, and all-inside - with stepwise descriptions, indications, advantages/limitations, devices, and complication profiles. Inside-out offers precise, strong fixation but requires an accessory incision and neurovascular precautions; outside-in is reproducible and cost-efficient for anterior horn tears; and all-inside reduces soft-tissue dissection and operative time, improving access to posterior/body regions. No single meniscal repair technique demonstrates clear superiority in healing or failure rates; outcomes depend on tear characteristics and patient factors. Although modern all-suture all-inside devices show favorable biomechanics, their higher cost and unclear cost-effectiveness limit definitive clinical advantage. Technical pearls include optimized portal placement, peripheral bites, protection of neurovascular structures, and avoidance of soft-tissue bridges. Concomitant ACL reconstruction enhances healing - likely via improved stability and marrow-derived biologic augmentation. Region-specific guidance is provided using medial and lateral anatomical zoning, aligning suture patterns (inside-out, outside-in, and all-inside) to tear location to preserve biomechanics and reduce complications.

Indexed as

all-insideinside-outknee arthroscopymeniscus repairoutside-in

Identifiers

PMID42383701
PMCPMC13326881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.