Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383598›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026

Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Fluoropyrimidines Versus FOLFOX as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Overlap-Weighted Restricted Mean Survival Time Analysis.

Shih-Feng Huang, Chao-Wen Hsu, Chih-Chien Wu, Yu-Hsun Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shih-Feng HuangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chao-Wen HsuDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chih-Chien WuDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5791-4047
Yu-Hsun ChenDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer, but oral fluoropyrimidines remain widely used for patients unsuitable for combination therapy. Real-world data comparing these strategies are limited.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with stage III colon cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (2017-2021). Using a 12-month landmark design, we compared disease-free survival (DFS) between patients receiving FOLFOX (IV-Only) versus oral fluoropyrimidines (PO-Only). The primary analysis used overlap-weighted restricted mean survival time (RMST) differences to quantify absolute treatment effects. Cox proportional hazards regression provided complementary hazard ratio estimates.

resultsOf 157 patients included, 58 (36.9%) received FOLFOX and 99 (63.1%) received oral fluoropyrimidines. During median follow-up of 36 months, 22 DFS events occurred. The 3-year DFS was 93.1% versus 76.5% for IV-Only and PO-Only groups, respectively. The primary analysis showed that patients receiving FOLFOX had 4.0 additional months of disease-free time over 48 months (RMST difference: 4.0 months; 95% CI, 0.6-7.9; p = 0.014) and 2.4 months over 36 months (RMST difference: 2.4 months; 95% CI, 0.2-4.7; p = 0.024). The hazard ratio from overlap-weighted Cox regression with covariate adjustment was 0.37 (95% CI 0.09-1.45; p = 0.154), directionally consistent with the RMST findings but not reaching statistical significance. Hazard ratio estimates were directionally consistent across sensitivity analyses but varied in statistical significance, likely reflecting limited power: unadjusted (HR 0.23; p = 0.019), stabilized weighting with covariates (HR 0.19; p = 0.046), and multivariable adjustment (HR 0.44; p = 0.249).

conclusionsIn this real-world cohort, oral fluoropyrimidines were associated with 4.0 fewer months of disease-free time compared with FOLFOX at 48 months among patients for whom both treatment options were appropriate. As a single-center study with limited events, these findings should be confirmed in larger multicenter cohorts. The combination of RMST with overlap weighting provides an interpretable framework for comparative effectiveness questions where treatment selection is strong.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColonic NeoplasmsPyrimidinesAdministration, OralAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOrganoplatinum CompoundsFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsPyrimidinesadjuvant chemotherapycolon cancerfluoropyrimidinesoverlap weightingrestricted mean survival time

Identifiers

PMID42383598
PMCPMC13355949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.