Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383563›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Probing the Underlying Mechanisms of Spectro-Temporal Modulation Discrimination.

Lily Cassandra Paulick, David López-Ramos, Léo Varnet, Peter Neri, Emmanuel Ponsot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lily Cassandra PaulickHearing Systems, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0004-7458-7665
David López-RamosScience & Technology of Music and Sound, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7119-6907
Léo VarnetLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Départment d'études cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
Peter NeriLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Départment d'études cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
Emmanuel PonsotScience & Technology of Music and Sound, IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech perception relies critically on the processing of spectro-temporal modulations (STMs), yet the mechanisms supporting STM perception and their role in explaining individual variability remain incompletely understood. This study employed a reverse-correlation paradigm, previously used for STM detection, to investigate how listeners discriminate between upward- and downward-moving STMs of identical temporal and spectral rates. Normal-hearing participants completed the task under three surround conditions: (i) no surround sound, (ii) surround sound consisting of the upward-moving STM and (iii) surround sound consisting of the downward-moving STM. Each stimulus was perturbed with structured spectro-temporal noise, from which perceptual kernels were derived. The data showed that listeners primarily weighted upward-moving targets, showing limited evidence of simultaneous monitoring of both directions. Sensitivity was selectively reduced in the downward-moving surround condition, suggesting orientation-specific interference. Simulations with a modulation filterbank model under different configurations, as well as behavioural performance differences across different experimental conditions, further supported the conclusion that participants relied predominantly on upward-target templates, with phase sensitivity additionally playing a critical role in replicating behavioural patterns. Nonetheless, substantial variability was observed in individual perceptual kernels that could not be captured by the model in its normal-hearing configuration. Overall, the results provide new insights into the mechanisms of STM discrimination and demonstrate the utility of reverse-correlation approaches for evaluating auditory models and probing perceptual decision strategies.

Indexed as

Auditory PathwaysDiscrimination, PsychologicalSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory ThresholdCuesFemaleHumansMaleNoisePsychoacousticsSound SpectrographyTime FactorsYoung Adultauditory modellingpsychophysical reverse correlationspectrotemporal modulation

Identifiers

PMID42383563
PMCPMC13323669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.