Trial reportApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026
Time course of perceptual, cognitive, physical and physiological responses to a single non-sleep deep rest session in physically active young adults.
Trial report in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time course of perceptual, cognitive, physical and physiological responses to a single non-sleep deep rest session in physically active young adults.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Trial
- Comparing the Effects of a Short Nap and Non-Sleep Deep Rest on Perceptual, Cognitive, and Physical Performance in Active Adults.Clocks & sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-sleep deep rest (NSDR), a brief guided relaxation technique involving slow breathing and sequential body awareness, has recently been proposed as a practical rest strategy. However, evidence on its short-term time course and physiological responses remains limited. This study examined the effects of a brief NSDR session on perceptual, cognitive, physical, and physiological outcomes in physically active young adults. In a parallel-group design, 102 participants (mean age: 22 ± 3 years) were randomly allocated to either a 10-min guided NSDR protocol (n = 51) or a control condition (n = 51). Perceptual outcomes included sleepiness, fatigue, readiness to perform, as well as muscular stress, lack of activation, negative emotional state, overall stress, physical performance capacity, mental performance capacity, emotional balance and overall recovery (short recovery and stress scale), alongside cognitive (Simon task) and physical (handgrip strength and countermovement jump) performance assessed at baseline, immediately, 20 min and 40 min post-intervention. Physiological responses (heart rate, heart rate variability and skin temperature) were recorded continuously during the intervention. Linear mixed-effects models showed that NSDR resulted in significant Group × Time improvements across perceptual measures, including reduced sleepiness (p = .009, η
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.