Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383408›Full record

ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2026

Effects on intrusive memories of playing Tetris with or without simultaneous and deliberate memory recall.

Kevin van Schie, Henrik Kessler, Iris M Engelhard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin van SchieDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-510X
Henrik KesslerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus Fulda, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Iris M EngelhardDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1117-932X

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNetherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two interventions that tax visuospatial working memory (WM) may reduce intrusive memories despite differing procedurally: playing Tetris with or without memory recall. Accordingly, this study examined how engagement with negative memories influences intrusion frequency (Experiment 1) and WM load (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1 (N = 90), participants viewed a trauma film and were assigned to Tetris without memory recall, Tetris with memory recall, or a no-task control condition. Participants rated memory vividness and unpleasantness before and after the intervention and recorded film-related intrusions in a diary for 1 week. In Experiment 2 (N = 45), a reaction time task assessed whether brief memory reactivation (as used in the Tetris without memory recall condition) or concurrent, deliberate recall (as used in the Tetris with memory recall condition) differentially taxed WM. Experiment 1 showed that the Tetris with memory recall task led to the largest reductions in memory vividness, η

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermMental RecallStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42383408
PMCPMC13639210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.