Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383274›Full record

ArticleAutism in adulthood2026

Autism Terminology Preferences Among Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults in North America.

Zoe S Robertson, Kayden M Stockwell, Andrew J Lampi, Vikram K Jaswal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism in adulthood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zoe S RobertsonUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-2509
Kayden M StockwellUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3887-796X
Andrew J LampiUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Vikram K JaswalUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is widespread debate about the language used to describe autistic people; many professionals prefer person-first language (e.g., "person with autism"), and many autistic people prefer identity-first language (e.g., "autistic person"). Although prior surveys of the autism community's terminology preferences have reported participants' evaluations of individual terms, limited research has directly compared evaluations of discrete categories of identity- and person-first terms. Additionally, there is a need to more fully understand participants' evaluations of terms relevant to autistic people outside of the identity- and person-first debate. Methods: In total, 784 North American adults ( Results: Both autistic and non-autistic participants were more likely to use identity-first terms than person-first terms, ranked identity-first terms more highly than person-first terms, and liked identity-first terms more than person-first terms. Participants' open-ended responses provided some context for the quantitative findings and highlighted their critical views of functioning labels. Conclusion: Consistent with other recent work with different samples and different methodologies, the North American participants in the current study preferred identity-first terms over person-first terms. That said, there was variability, with some autistic and non-autistic participants strongly preferring person-first terms. We end by providing recommendations on incorporating our findings into future research and practice. Community Brief:

Indexed as

identity firstperson firstpreferencesterminology

Identifiers

PMID42383274
PMCPMC13315286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.