Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383174›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2026

National study of medical education, ethical attitudes and curricular exposure to voluntary assisted dying by VOICE (Views Of Incoming Clinicians on End-of-life care).

Hamaad Ahmad Khan, Karanjot Chhatwal, Michael Bryan, Dev Gakhar, Rasi Mizori, Shreeya Mehta, Jawad Aziz, Harnoor Garha, Alisha Mahmud, Yusuf Alghabra and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hamaad Ahmad KhanSchool of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Karanjot ChhatwalImperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Michael BryanNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dev GakharLeicester Medical School, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Rasi MizoriFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Campus, SE1 1UL London, United Kingdom.
Shreeya MehtaFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Campus, SE1 1UL London, United Kingdom.
Jawad AzizImperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Harnoor GarhaFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Campus, SE1 1UL London, United Kingdom.
Alisha MahmudImperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Yusuf AlghabraFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Campus, SE1 1UL London, United Kingdom.
Rhieya RahulSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland.
Jackson T S CheungFaculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Rami SatiFaculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Issam MotairekDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Fadi AdelDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Stuart D RosenNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom.
Simon C CorkSchool of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Sammy ArabDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
MedNex Research Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Legislative moves to legalise assisted dying in the UK have renewed discussion on future clinicians' preparedness for new potential responsibilities. This study examined medical students' ethical attitudes, legal understanding and curricular exposure. Methods: VOICE was a national cross-sectional survey of UK and Ireland medical students in 2025 (n = 896). The questionnaire assessed ethical views, confidence, legal knowledge and teaching exposure. Descriptive statistics, thematic analysis and multivariable logistic regression explored predictors of ethical agreement, curriculum coverage and legal knowledge. Results: Most students (64.5%) believed that assisted dying can be ethically justified, yet legal knowledge was limited; only 7.6% correctly identified all eligibility criteria. Nearly 70% reported minimal curricular coverage. Formal teaching was associated with higher confidence and greater ethical agreement. Regional variation and concerns about coercion and inequalities were common. Conclusion: Students show broad ethical support but have very limited confidence, legal understanding and curricular preparation, highlighting the need for structured education.

Indexed as

Assisted dyingEnd-of-life careEthicsMedical educationMedical students

Identifiers

PMID42383174
PMCPMC13315502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.